This website is no longer being maintained as of June 2010.
For current DLF information please go to: www.diglib.org
random quote Link: Publications Forum Link: About DLF Link: News
Link: Digital Collections Link: Digital Production Link: Digital Preservation Link: Use, users, and user support Link: Build: Digital Library Architectures, Systems, and Tools
photo of books

DLF PARTNERS

  1. Bibliotheca Alexandrina
  2. British Library
  3. California Digital Library
  4. Carnegie Mellon University
  5. Columbia University
  6. Cornell University
  7. Council on Library and Information Resources
  8. Dartmouth College
  9. Emory University
  10. Harvard University
  11. Indiana University
  12. Johns Hopkins University
  13. Library of Congress
  14. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  15. New York Public Library
  16. New York University
  17. North Carolina State University
  18. Oxford University
  19. Pennsylvania State University
  20. Princeton University
  21. Rice University
  22. Stanford University
  23. University of California, Berkeley
  24. University of California, Los Angeles
  25. University of Chicago
  26. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  27. University of Michigan
  28. University of Minnesota
  29. University of Pennsylvania
  30. University of Southern California
  31. University of Tennessee
  32. University of Texas at Austin
  33. University of Virginia
  34. University of Washington
  35. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration
  36. U.S. National Library of Medicine
  37. Yale University
""

DLF ALLIES

  1. Coalition for Networked Information (CNI)
  2. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)
  3. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC)
  4. Los Alamos National Laboratory Research Library
  5. OCLC Online Computer Library Center
""

Comments

Please send the DLF Executive Director your comments or suggestions.

OCKHAM
A framework and forum for evolving digital library architectures

OCKHAM was conceived of as a series of discussions about key architectural and technical issues confronting digital library developers. An initial meeting to establish an agenda for these discussions was held in conjunction with the DLF forum in Chicago on May 10, 2002. This think-tank group met several times during 2002/2003, at Emory and at DLF Forums, resulting in a the collaborative writing of a successful grant of $425,000 from the NSF to the Ockham network -- Emory, Notre Dame, the University of Arizona, and the Computer Science Department of Virginia Tech -- for "The OCKHAM Library Network: Integrating the NSDL into Traditional Library Services." The goal of the project is to improve usage and access to the National Science Digital Libraries by learning communities through the existing national infrastructure of traditional libraries.

To accomplish its goal, OCKHAM is combining theoretical work and practical application development. On the theoretical side, OCKHAM will articulate, describe and illustrate the definitions and relationships of various information-related activities. Such activities include searching, browsing, annotating, reviewing, evaluating, disseminating, creating, editing, deleting, etc. Based on these definitions and relationships, a set of computer communication protocols will be created and adapted for the purposes of standardizing the activities. Finally, a number of sample Web-based services will be implemented and shared as open source software demonstrating the project's feasibility. For more information, see this longer description.


Initial Proposal, April 18, 2002

D. Greenstein (DLF) and Martin Halbert (Emory University)

Even at their different stages of development, digital libraries are beginning to look for generalizable technical solutions and for an architecture or framework within which such solutions can be implemented, shared, and discussed.

Some of the DLF member library programs (Harvard, NYU, Columbia perhaps) focus from the outset on the design an implementation of such a framework. Others (Michigan, Indiana, Virginia, perhaps) develop this orientation after a period of experimentation that produces a legacy of different, potentially incompatible collections and services.

What is interesting is how so many are now actively engaged in trying to define and build some over-arching digital library architecture. Indeed, it is arguably the one activity that DLF members (digital libraries perhaps) share most in common.

In light of this, DLF is initiating a series of discussions about key architectural and technical issues confronting digital library developers. A proposal prepared by Martin Halbert (Emory University) is supplied below as a contribution to seed discussion at an initial meeting. It focuses on the need to surface a high-level architecture. It is recognized, however, that OCKHAM may evolve in different as a venue where developers share information and insights about a variety of technical approaches and issues that confront them.

The initial meeting will be held on May 10th in conjunction with the DLF Forum in Chicago.

Martin Halbert's contribution follows.

There is a rapidly emerging arena of knowledge management systems that squarely lands in the middle of many of the needs of digital library endeavors these days. Many research libraries are currently having to cobble together our own ad hoc approaches to such systems, often built on top of software that is not based on the emerging standards of the library field. A group of digital librarians believe that a dialogue concering this issue should be initiated immediately, and that our respective efforts could be mobilized around the development of an open framework based on key standards such as METS, OAI, Dublin Core, EAD, TEI, and OpenURL. Systems developed using this framework would embody the modular design of new systems such as the Open Digital Library architecture from Virginia Tech, the National Science Digital Library, and other such systems. Components developed in this framework would share interoperabilty and could interchangeably provide the functionality of portal, metadata repository/PURL server, and content management systems.

Many research libraries have realized that we are individually working on pieces of such a system, and many feel that we are at a point where a face-to-face meeting would give us the opportunity to develop a set of development specifications and API protocols. Our working name for such a framework is OCKHAM, for Open Community Knowledge Hypermedia Administration and Metadata. The intellectual linkage to the philosopher William of Ockham is intentional, as his notion of not proliferating entities unnecessarily is similar to our concepts of not proliferating standards and development efforts unnecessarily if we can collaborate to achieve common goals.

As librarians who are part of a community that has devoted great effort to developing standards, we feel we can surely collaborate on the development of a system that is at least as good as other ad hoc non-standard open source efforts that are being adopted in many arenas, such as the rapidly spreading *Nuke family of content management systems.

And perhaps we can lead the way with a system that walks the walk we have been talking about for years now.

return to top >>