responds to these four areas like so:
|The first two =
no response, as such.
|The latter two =
the heart of our presentation: CP and WS.
|1.Itís a given, for us, that the OCW content merits
|It remains a
discussion re: content direct from CLEs (unfiltered through OCW)
|2. For our
project the bar is not terribly high re: disaggregation & similar of OCW
courses.† They donít lend themselves to
it, and the repository doesnít (yet?) lend itself to dealing with a lot of
flexibility in this vein.†† Leaving
this ďAs-IsĒ for the moment.† Future
Packaging, and in particular an Application Profile to content packaging, is
central to our work.† As for the choice
of _which_ content packaging standard, details later.
|4. Web Services
are called for, and we chose a particular technical approach to this that
maps well to a digital archive.†
|CUE NEXT SLIDE
|So, before we
dive into these two topics, what is a BIRDíS EYE VIEW of what we are trying
to achieve ? TURN Ö 1st of 3† InterOpÖ