|
1
|
- CNI Taskforce Meeting
- San Antonio
- December 6th 2002
|
|
2
|
- Thirty members ; four allies
- Housed by Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) in DC
- Created in 1995 by ULs of major research libraries
- Fills a need not simply met by large library organizations : focus
exclusively on DL matters, be nimble, agile, collaborative
|
|
3
|
- Lightweight administrative structure: full-time staff of 2.5
- Heavyweight investment from
members : a real buy-in at UL level (Steering Committee); staff
participate actively in working groups, exploratory sessions, Forums.
- An incubator more than a maintainer
|
|
4
|
- Not open to all comers
- Not representative by design of the larger digital library world
- Not (in intent) US-only
- Not permanent – 5 year life (renewable)
- Not cumbersome or formal
|
|
5
|
- Open Archives Initiative – OAI metadata format and harvester – has been
a real success for the CNI/DLF partnership that has funded it.
- METS – common metadata standard for managing multiple metadata streams
in a digital library (and across them)
|
|
6
|
- Guide to Good Practice: Cataloging Standards for Describing Cultural
Objects and Images. The DLF and the Getty Grant Program sponsors the
Visual Resources Association (VRA) to review and evaluate existing data
content standards and current practice in order to compile a manual that
may be used to describe, document, and catalog cultural objects and
their visual surrogates.
|
|
7
|
- EAD Archival Toolkit – a coordination of production and delivery
software and workflow practices for Encoded Archival Descriptions
guides.
- Registry of Digital Masters – with OCLC – MARC-based registry of
monographs and serials.
|
|
8
|
- Dimensions and use of the scholarly information environment. A Data Set
Assembled by the Digital Library Federation and Outsell, Inc. Tells us a lot about what users do,
and how – challenge is to use this to gain a better understanding of
why.
- www.diglib.org/pubs/scholinfo/
|
|
9
|
- Courseware/library interface
- Reclaiming our users
- Building services in front of journal/publisher silos
- XML tools (EAD)
- Coordinating digital production
- Digital video
|
|
10
|
- DLF Forum: twice-a-year meeting – similar to CNI Task Force in design –
highly valued by membership
- the attendance limit of 4 people per institution for the DLF Forum is
now no more
|
|
11
|
- Collections: DLF Electronic Resource Management Initiative: This project
will develop XML-based structure to manage the license agreements and
related administrative information that governs the use of digital
library content. [Tim Jewell and
others]
|
|
12
|
- DLF Registry of Digital File Formats -- essential for long-term
preservation, and currently is either missing or scattered – this team
proposes to describe the problem clearly and search for a home for an
integrated register [Harvard, LC, RLG, NARA, MIT, PRO (UK), Bibliotheque
Nationale]
|
|
13
|
- DLF publications policy: DLF
publications now follow the good practices for digital library content
that we promote – re-usable and validated XML from which to generate
html, PDF, and ebook derivatives; Dublin Core records that can be shaped
into OAI metadata; Americans With Disabilities Act compliance.
- DLF website re-design: a professional design company has been
commissioned to refresh the website.
|
|
14
|
- Vendor Forum: this needs careful thought and planning, but there is
general support for a meeting that puts us together with invited members
of the digital library software and hardware vendor community. Areas of concentration could be the
need for local customized delivery of online journal articles;
courseware systems.
|
|
15
|
- Forum Fellowships for junior faculty/staff – cost share of cost of
sending a junior staff member to the Forum.
- Key Concept Executive Summaries: “quick guides” on key DLF topics (OAI,
METS, MODS, XML, EAD, Shibboleth, and so on) for senior university
executives.
|
|
16
|
- Improve communications
- Support practical work and also strategic planning
- Preserve nimbleness and agility
- Strengthen partnerships – vendors, scholars, publishers, teachers
- Challenge our US-centricity
- Support the smart, active, and ambitious membership – and find means to
engage and excite new members of our profession
|