Spring 2006 DLF Forum: Melvyl Recommender Project, 18
3 April, 2006
Outline
●Text-based discovery system
● User interface strategies
● Spelling correction
● Enhanced relevance ranking
● Recommending
The current Melvyl system orders records LIFO....more recently catalogued items come to the top.   Not terribly useful for very large result sets, which are common.

Interested in ranking by relevance based on the content of records, which has been applied successfully in many other settings.  Will it work here, on bibliographic records?

Second, interested in considering whether additional “intentional data”....circulation, holdings...could provide even better results from the perspective of an academic user.