1	Xubmit: A system for managing text collections Dazhi Jiao, Tamara Lopez, and Jenn Riley Indiana University Digital Library Program DLF 2006 Spring Forum: Austin, Texas April 10-12, 2006
2	Overview IU Environment Case Studies EAD IU Finding Aids TEI The Chymistry of Isaac Newton Analysis Process Problems Xubmit Technology overview Demonstration Conclusions
3	IU Environment Digital Library Program provides a central home for library and faculty digital library activities Consulting Content creation Metadata creation Delivery Enormous diversity of projects Currently undergoing a complete redesign of our digital library software infrastructure
4	Case Study - EAD IU Finding Aids Encoded by multiple repositories at IU Encoding done in <oXygen /> XML template created and maintained by EAD Working Group Completed files delivered to DLP for online delivery Currently delivered via DLXS; soon to be delivered via XTF Tested RLG’s EAD Report Card for improving encoding workflow
5	Case Study - TEI The Chymistry of Isaac Newton multi-stage, iterative transcription initial encoding XSLT transformation editing and proofing possible modification of encoding practice(s) and/or XSLT repeat steps 3-5 until editors are satisfied.
6	Analysis - Process
7	Analysis - Process
8	Analysis - Architecture
9	Xubmit :: Implementation Submission Flow Spring Webflow Repository JRCS, Platform Independent XML Validation / Transformation Xerces, Saxon, XML Catalogs Web application Struts, JSP, Javascript
10	Xubmit :: Submission Flow Flow UML Diagram
11	Xubmit :: Schematron Pros Simple vocabulary Allows for robust reporting Uses standards: XPATH, XSLT Becoming an ISO standard Cons Verbose Maintenance No support for variables Not an ISO standard yet.
12	Xubmit :: Demonstration
13	Resources and References Resources JRCS: http://www.suigeneris.org/kb/display/jrcs/home Saxon: http://www.saxonica.com Schematron: http://www.schematron.com/ Spring Webflow: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/WEBFLOW/Home Xerces: http://xerces.apache.org/xerces-j/ XML Catalog: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/14809/xml-catalogs.html References Baecker, R. M, Nastos, D., Posner, I.R. & Mawby, K.L.(1993). The user-centered iterative design of collaborative writing software. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. pp. 399 - 405 Dillon, A. (1993) How collaborative is collaborative writing? An analysis of the production of two technical reports. Published in M.Sharples (Ed) Computer Supported Collaborative Writing, London: Springer-Verlag, pp 69-86. Retrieved April, 2006 from: http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/BookChapters/collaborative%20writing.htm Jacinto, M., Librelotto, G. R., Ramalho, J.C.L & Henriques, P.R. (2002). Constraint specification languages: comparing XCSL, Schematron and XML-Schemas. XML Europe, 2002. Retrieved April, 2006 from: http://www.idealliance.org/papers/xmle02/dx_xmle02/papers/03-03-02/03-03-02.pdf Jelliffe, R. (2000). Getting Information into markup: the data model behind the schematron assertion language. A technical whitepaper for GeoTempo, Inc. October 19, 2000. Retrieved April, 2006 from: http://www.sinica.edu.tw/~ricko/schematron.PDF Kim, H. & Eklundh, K. (2001). Reviewing Practices in Collaborative Writing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 10: 247-259, 2001. Lee, D. & Chu, W. (2000). Comparative Analysis of Six XML Schema Languages1. ACM SIGMOD Record 29(3), September 2000.Retrieved April, 2006 from: http://cobase-www.cs.ucla.edu/tech-docs/dongwon/sigmod-record-00.html