DLF Spring 2006
MIT's CWSpace
3
Perceived Need:
inter-operability™
•Obvious observation: Higher Ed. Technologies increasingly seeking integration with Library & Repository holdings
•
•Not so obvious(?):  Libraries seeing their charter to include collection, preservation, dissemination of Teaching & Learning materials (?)
Here we mean InterOperation not only from system to system, but from entire domain to another: the world of teaching in higher education and that of the libraries.

“inter-operability” ™ with lowercase ‘i’ and ‘o’, and tongue-in-cheek “TradeMark,” is meant to signify “First Level” of interoperability, namely, that of moving packages of content around successfully.

First Level is all that this project claims to achieve.
•Second Level of interoperability might be that the semantics of what is received are understood, able to be processed.
Metadata like RDF, etc.
•Third Level might be that the pedagogical design of the prepared materials is (or can be made to be) coherent and suitable to incorporate with other materials in the collection.   Learning Design and similar topics in which we don’t claim expertise.

Also - Higher Ed Tech sees need increasingly to Archive and to Preserve and to get Persistent URLs to material.
Also - Simply the “born digital” nature of Teaching materials today is large driver to ask of Libraries/Repositories to manage it (cf. in past - no one conceived of Libraries holding course materials on paper, overhead slides, etc.)

CUE NEXT SLIDE
So, the growing intersection of interests and activity between these two domains creates some NEW OPPORTUNITIES  for development …  TURN   (New Ground)