Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Dumbing Up or Dumbing Down?
2
Developing a flexible information architecture
  • NYPL Digital Gallery
  • Project Background
  • Content vs. Context
  • Building the Public Interface
    • Challenges and lessons
    • Defining categories (apples or oranges) ?
    • New I.A. directions
3
Images at NYPL
  • New York Public Library images have historically been given exhibition-level treatment online
  • Single, distinct collections
  • Curatorial oversight for images & descriptions
  • Size = 150 to 8,000 images
  • Web site(s) = stand-alone applications
4
Moving from an exhibition model to data-driven infrastructure
  • Ingest data from disparate Library collections
  • Oracle database & in-house Digital Assets Mgt. System
    • Metadata for 500,000+ images
  • Image data & storage
    • Input by Metadata, Imaging staff
    • Legacy-data loaded from other sources
    • Multiple terabytes of archival TIFF, JPG and GIF files
5
APIs, hardware, software
  • Back-end interface
    • Oracle, Cold Fusion application server


  • Public interface
    • Sun (UNIX) presentation server
    • Lucene (open source) search engine, XML data files
    • CFMX custom tags, java, CFML for display
6
CONTENT VS. CONTEXT
7
Access points for Digital Library Program content
  • Content can be accessed via:
    • Descriptive Metadata
    • Collection naming
    • Categorization
    • Randomly
8
Content description - examining a Real World Object
9
Assigning access points
10
Input metadata into Digital Asset Management System
11
Organization of a Real World collection
12
Real World Collection structure:  for large collection
  • “Photographic views of New York City, 1870's-1970's ”
  • Over 50,000 images
  • Flat structure, few levels
  • Each directory holds thousands
    of images
  • Each record contains image(s)
  • Artifact has verso


13
Real World Collection structure:  for small collection
  • “The A.G. Spalding Baseball Card Collection
  • Less than 1,000 images
  • Flat structure, no levels
  • Subjects might be leveraged
    for hierarchy?
    • players, positions
    • players, by teams

14
Metadata describes these collection/title “levels” ...
15
... while XML allows flattening of levels for search & retrieval
16
Example of earlier title-levels display
17
Searchable, expandable title-levels
18
Browsing a multi-level title
19
Functional Requirements for record-level access points
20
Interpreting access points
21
Providing context for NYPL Research Libraries’ material
22
Providing context:  NYPL call number = 0 hits in library catalog
23
Providing context:  NYPL title = 0 hits in library catalog
24
Providing context:  Guide to the (NYPL) Research Collections
25
How can we provide sufficient Research Libraries’ context?
  • In the previous example, a date or title is difficult to locate in the NYPL Research Libraries’ catalog
  • Title is not available in online NYPL Catalog
    • 18th Century date for Playing Cards: Mechanics is mentioned in the Guide to the Research Collections of the New York Public Library (published 1975)
  • How do we link to this type of non-cataloged information from Digital Gallery metadata, especially if it is not in a standard reference format?
26
BUILDING THE PUBLIC INTERFACE
27
The new public (inter)face of NYPL’s Digital Gallery
  • Where we’ve been
    • Several earlier iterations in previous development
    • Challenges:
      • data issues, software development framework(s)
  • Version 4.x :   Dumbing up or down?
    • simple = not necessarily elegant ?
      • simpler = user-friendly ?

    • more access paths = user confusion?
      • better access paths = user confidence?
28
Where we’d been: hand-crafted collections
29
Collection example
30
Hand-building virtual collections
  • Did not scale
  • Necessitated endless revision of both content and labels
  • Cognitive dissonance created by interface:
    • when user clicked into a detail view or searched:  the categories and titles in our data were often different than our curated title lists
  • Content not managed by data
31
WHAT’S IN A CATEGORY (APPLES or ORANGES?)
32
2004 Digital Gallery development site overhaul
  • In winter 2003-04, RazorFish, Inc., consulted by DLP


  • Needs:
    • Improve look-and-feel of overall navigation and site functions within the scope of existing back-end development (i.e. without re-writing our software)

  • Outcomes:
    • New: ‘topics/collections’ paradigm
    • New: ‘find related images’ widget
    • Improved visual language for user calls-to-action
33
New paradigm for categories & collections
  • “Explore Topics”
  • Contain topical featured selections
  • Selections are hand-curated vs. cataloged
  • Topics represent several broad categories
    (“big buckets”)
  • Can feature topical searches or subjects
34
Example of “Explore Topic” feature
  • Topical “Big Buckets”
35
Functional requirements for Topics & Collections
  • Topics (or “big buckets”)
    • Do not hold everything
    • Virtually constructed container
    • Are not exclusive: data can cross topics
    • Only curated selections: “featured resources”
    • Selected representation of online holdings

  • Collections
    • Do hold everything: a place for everything, and everything in ....
    • Represent real-world objects
    • User can scope search by collection
    • Are exclusive (?)
    • Comprehensive for online holdings
36
New Tool: “Search for Related Images”
37
Laser or a net?
38
Limit search
39
Expand search
40
Expanded search results
41
Improved visual language
  • When selecting images for user’s portfolio ...
42
Improved visual language
  • Portfolio selection is now highlighted.
43
Some of the lessons learned in Versions 1.0 > 4.0
  • If problems exist in data, try to fix them in data
    • It is difficult, if not impossible, to curate your way out of data anomalies
  • Rationalize look-and-feel of site
    •  Create visual language for interface

  • Simplicity is hard to do well
    • “Keep it simple, stupid”
44
Going forward ....
45
... more IA challenges …
46
... will present more opportunities for increased access.