Possible futures: my questions for you!
vFull MODS support
§Plugin for MODS – trivial if we flatten subfields, but we should do it properly?
§Store MODS internally? – but we must continue to support user-defined metadata formats
§Extend GLI to MODS editor – or link to external editor?
vFormalize METS support
§Define and register METS “profile” for Greenstone – but is this useful?
§Too ambitious to support full METS? – should we study popular METS profiles?
vBridge to DSpace: StoneD
§For Greenstone2: DSpace plugin, export to DSpace – is this all we need?
§For Greenstone3: runtime Greenstone3 service that encapsulates DSpace repository?
vIntroduce workflow features
§Institutional repository, conference submission/review, other workflows …
– or rely on external linkups, e.g. DSpace?
vHow to fund development?
§scarce resources better used for internationalization, support for developing countries?
vHow to create sustainable user support services?
§Currently NZDL group provides excellent online support
§UNESCO envisages network of regional Greenstone centers
§Central coordination/support services necessary