|
1
|
- A report to the DLF Steering Committee
- Service Framework Group:
- Peter Brantley
- Lorcan Dempsey
- Dale Flecker
- Brian Lavoie
- Krisellen Maloney
- Andy Powell
- Mackenzie Smith.
|
|
2
|
- Repositories
- Metasearch/resolver
- Resolver/E-resource management
- Aquifer
|
|
3
|
- Course management systems
- e-portfolio
- Chandler
- Virtual Research Environment
- Search engines
|
|
4
|
- We have moved past our shared sense of the library and its systems
- We do not have a shared model to organize endeavor.
|
|
5
|
- … is a tool for organizing attention
- … supports discussion, investment, design, development.
- … is not a substitute for creativity, bottom up activity, ….
|
|
6
|
- JISC Information environment
- OAIS Reference Model
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Contributes towards:
- A more modular approach to design and development
- A foundation for collaboration among libraries
- Lower development and ownership costs.
- Expressing the value of the library to other communities
- Alignment of library planning
- Identification of gaps and development needs
|
|
11
|
- Very difficult to effectively
- Federate digital library services
- Realize savings through shared systems and services or components from
third parties
- Respond to change with flexible modular systems environments
- Align strategic objectives and systems environments.
|
|
12
|
- Aquifer cannot be understood, planned or implemented in the absence of a
service framework
- Standards investment can't be responsibly made without a service
framework
- We can't interact with the crucial external communities and workflow
builders without a service framework
|
|
13
|
- Recommendation 1
- Secure dedicated effort to advance framework.
- A fellow.
- Seek shared funding but be prepared to entirely fund.
- Charge to Director to work with SF Group to bring proposal to Executive
Group.
- Recommendation 2
- Research library of the future
- Scenario work
- Seek to advance work with CNI, Mellon, ….
|